Privacy Policy


What is “Personal Information”

Information is regarded as personal when it tells something about a human being who is or can be (uniquely) identified. This definition stems from European law, and is intentionally broad in order to provide a high level of privacy protection.

This means, for example, that not just names and e-mail addresses can be personal information, but also numbers or other identifiers, such as your IP-address, to the extent that they link other information to a specific human being.

Data Collection

We don't collect any personal information about our visitors. This is a first and very important condition to safeguard your privacy. If personal information isn’t collected, it can’t be stolen, demanded, leaked or exposed.

When you visit our website, we do not record your IP address, we do not record the browser.

This zero personal data collection policy protects your privacy, since your IP address, browser, and platform information can be combined with other data to uniquely identify your computer, your location, or you.
Privacy Policy

Family Portraits 1

The initial project to work with family photographs came about through a collaboration with Ingo Hartmann, a psychoanalyst working in Düsseldorf who became an important friend and mentor of Struth’s. Hartmann occasionally asked new patients to bring some of their own family photographs as a means of exploring how they might represent certain dynamics within their family life.

Hartmann had seen some of Struth’s Düsseldorf street photographs and in 1982 he suggested they collaborate on a research project. Together they collected family photographs from forty people. Struth then made black-and-white prints, all in the same format and size, so that they could function better as a tool for comparative analysis. They then organised the images into groups based on different categories. “We were hoping to retrieve and present what was legible and understandable, to see what narratives about family life could be reconstructed from this evidence.” Around sixty images were presented as an exhibition called Familienleben at the Deutsche Akademie für Psychoanalyse in Düsseldorf in 1982 and a second time at the Institute’s branch in Freiburg in 1983. The collaboration with Hartmann was considered by both of them as research and Struth has never exhibited this project in an art context.

The first family photograph subsequently exhibited by Struth was initially made as a gift. In 1985 he stayed for a few weeks at the home of the artist Alan Johnston and his family in Edinburgh. At the end of his stay he made a black-and-white photograph of the Johnston family—father, mother and two young children—grouped close together sitting on a bench in the back of their house facing the garden. A year later Struth made a second family portrait in the garden of the Shimada family in Yamaguchi in Japan. There was no conscious connection to, or reflection about, the collaboration with Ingo Hartmann at this time. But seeing the two family portraits together, one from Scotland, one from Japan, in their respective gardens, showed the potential for something more revealing than occasional individual portraits had suggested. Struth could see parallels to his interest in urban space, the issue of the unconscious and its relationship to what is evident and emblematic in a given culture at a certain point in time.

“The question of the family was precipitated largely through an attempt to analyse and understand my own family, my family’s history and myself within this context. Your own family is not something you have a choice about. The family was a very charged issue in the Germany I grew up in. The question of what your family did under fascism was never far away, why they accepted what was going on, how this affected them in the period of reconstruction and starting a family after the war and how, as a child, you can define a moral position towards the atrocities of the holocaust and the questions you have for your parents.

“When you look at family photographs you understand through the traces something of what was going on, of the social structure of the time. I kept thinking about these questions when I was looking at my parents’ and grandparents’ family photographs. To say that photographs are a fiction, or that they lie, is not enough. The traces of structures, social and psychological, are legible.”

The making of one of Struth’s family portraits is always informed by the same set of conditions. The initial invitation comes from the artist; the family portraits are, with rare exceptions, not made on commission. The family decides together with Struth the location and framing of the photograph in their home or garden. They organise and pose themselves. They are always asked to look directly into the camera. Struth was initially concerned that the family portraits would be misconstrued as classical and old-fashioned. On the other hand, the connection of his work to common kinds of photography embedded in everyday life has been a continuing interest, and family photography is probably the most common form of all.

A first group of family portraits was exhibited as part of Struth’s exhibition Neue Bilder at Galerie Max Hetzler in Cologne in January 1989. Eleven family portraits were exhibited alongside portraits of individuals and couples in Thomas Struth: Portraits at the Museum Haus Lange in Krefeld in 1992. The family portraits are an ongoing project, developing at its own pace alongside other series of works.

Eleonor and Giles Robertson

Chromogenic print
Cat. 3511
66,0 x 84,0 cm


The Hirose Family

Silver gelatin print
Cat. 3561
74,0 x 92,0 cm


The Bernstein Family

Chromogenic print
Cat. 3961
125,8 x 158,0 cm